Proposing U.S. disengagement from California and Texas

The Israeli elections have pretty much taken over all of j-blogsphere this week, but there has been an interesting development that deserves serious attention even though it has no connection whatsoever to Israel or the Jews.

First let me begin by saying that my historical education has been a great big lie. Everything I ever learned about the birth of the United States has been inaccurately portrayed. It turns out that the early Americans were brutal occupiers, the 13 colonies were illegal settlements, the pioneer movement was government sanctioned land-theft, etc... Particularly areas in the southwest such as Texas or Southern California, which were only 'recently' incorporated into the mainland, are disputed territories.

This past weekend half a million rightful owners of the land took to the streets of Los Angeles and marched in protest of proposed legislature that would impose stricter penalties on illegal immigrants and their employers.

Students peacefully protesting:



Establishing the facts:






(Pictures from Gran Marcha via Michelle Malkin)

These protesters should not be called radical, racist seperatists or ethnic supremacists; oh no!- they're rightful owners of the land and victims of American aggression, occupation, and militant imperialism. Some, believe it or not, have proposed building a wall (see) to prevent further entry of so called 'illegal immigrants', not realizing this would constitute apartheid (see). If only the government would realize that they are the rightful citizens who pledge complete loyalty to this land of Atzlan. President Bush and Mexican President Fox are currently meeting in Cancun for talks to discuss... a two-state solution, perhaps?



There may even be discussion of a possible disengagement of U.S. forces from illegaly occupied Mexican territory. Oh, you this is outrageous? Well, think again!

/sarcasm>